State v. Casin
This text of 142 P.3d 123 (State v. Casin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005), and assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of possession of methamphetamine. Defendant argues that the evidence was obtained through exploitation of an unlawful stop in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. We agree and accept the state’s concession.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 P.3d 123, 207 Or. App. 635, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-casin-orctapp-2006.