State v. Cashman

62 N.H. 697
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Indictment for embezzlement. Facts agreed. Counsel disagreeing as to the question intended to be raised, no decision was . rendered, and the case was discharged.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cashman, 62 N.H. 697 (N.H. 1882).

62 N.H. 697 (State v. Cashman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad v. Boston & Lowell Railroad
23 A. 529 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1888)