State v. Case
This text of 202 S.W.3d 58 (State v. Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Erik Case appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance and ten-year prison sentence. He contends the trial court erred in admitting testimony regarding the typical amount of marijuana a user would possess. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the conviction.
The parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 S.W.3d 58, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1445, 2006 WL 2785737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-case-moctapp-2006.