State v. Case
202 S.W.3d 58, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1445, 2006 WL 2785737
Opinion
ORDER
Erik Case appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance and ten-year prison sentence. He contends the trial court erred in admitting testimony regarding the typical amount of marijuana a user would possess. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the conviction.
The parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Case, 202 S.W.3d 58, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1445, 2006 WL 2785737 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
202 S.W.3d 58 (State v. Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Case v. State
283 S.W.3d 309 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)