State v. Carver
This text of 167 S.E.2d 57 (State v. Carver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In his brief, defendant’s court-appointed counsel brings forward no assignment of error and states that he is unable to find error in the record. He asks that the court review the record for error and this we have done. We find that the defendant was charged under a valid bill of indictment, that he was given a fair trial free from prejudicial error, and that the sentence imposed was within statutory limits. State v. Williams, 3 N.C. App. 233, 164 S.E. 2d 404, and cases therein cited.
The judgment of the superior court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 S.E.2d 57, 4 N.C. App. 520, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carver-ncctapp-1969.