State v. Carter

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Carter

868 N.E.2d 677, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1422

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 19, 2007

Docket1991-0963

StatusPublished

This text of 868 N.E.2d 677 (State v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carter, 868 N.E.2d 677, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1422 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-890513. By entry filed March 28, 2007, this court ordered that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution on July 10, 2007. In order to facilitate this court’s timely consideration of any matters relating to the execution of appellant’s sentence,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the Chief Justice may suspend application of any provisions of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, including, but not limited to, the filing requirements imposed by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of documents as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2), shall be personal, by facsimile transmission, or by e-mail.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel of record for the parties shall provide this court with a copy of any document relating to this matter that is filed in, or issued by, any other court in this state or any federal court, as well as any commutation, pardon, or warrant of reprieve issued by the Governor. A copy of the document shall be delivered to the Office of the Clerk as soon as possible, either personally, by facsimile transmission, or by e-mail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-890513. By entry filed March 28, 2007, this court ordered that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution on July 10, 2007. In order to facilitate this court’s timely consideration of any matters relating to the execution of appellant’s sentence,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the Chief Justice may suspend application of any provisions of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, including, but not limited to, the filing requirements imposed by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of documents as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2), shall be personal, by facsimile transmission, or by e-mail.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel of record for the parties shall provide this court with a copy of any document relating to this matter that is filed in, or issued by, any other court in this state or any federal court, as well as any commutation, pardon, or warrant of reprieve issued by the Governor. A copy of the document shall be delivered to the Office of the Clerk as soon as possible, either personally, by facsimile transmission, or by e-mail.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 N.E.2d 677, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carter-ohio-2007.