State v. Carter
This text of 292 Neb. 481 (State v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/courts/epub/ 01/15/2016 12:05 PM CST
- 481 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 292 Nebraska R eports STATE v. CARTER Cite as 292 Neb. 481
State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Victor L. Carter, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___
Filed January 15, 2016. No. S-14-1089.
supplemental opinion
Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: Gary B. R andall, Judge. Affirmed. Steve Lefler, of Lefler, Kuehl & Burns, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Kimberly A. Klein for appellee. Victor L. Carter, pro se. Heavican, C.J., Wright, Connolly, McCormack, Miller- Lerman, Cassel, and Stacy, JJ. Per Curiam. We held case No. S-14-1089 under submission pending payment of the statutory docket fee pursuant to our decision in State v. Carter.1 The docket fee was timely paid, and we now consider the merits of the appeal. As was foreshadowed in Carter, we find Victor L. Carter’s motion for postconviction relief to be meritless. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. A ffirmed. McCormack, J., not participating in the decision.
1 State v. Carter, 292 Neb. 16, 870 N.W.2d 641 (2015).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 Neb. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carter-neb-2016.