State v. Carter

153 S.E.2d 388, 269 N.C. 697, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1138
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 22, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 153 S.E.2d 388 (State v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Carter, 153 S.E.2d 388, 269 N.C. 697, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1138 (N.C. 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s sole assignment of error is that the court erred in pronouncing an excessive, cruel and unreasonable punishment and the record proper does not support the judgment as set out.

Defendant’s plea of nolo contendere to the three felony counts permitted the judge to impose sentences totaling 30 years. G.S. 14-2, G.S. 14-54, G.S. 14-70 and G.S. 14-72; State v. Cooper, 256 N.C. 372, 124 S.E. 2d 91. “When punishment does not exceed the limits fixed by the statute, it cannot be considered cruel and unusual punishment in a constitutional sense.” State v. Davis, 267 N.C. 126, 147 S.E. 2d 570. The sentences imposed were well within the statutory limits.

The record reveals that defendant was aware of the sentences that could be imposed before his plea of guilty was entered.

We have also carefully reviewed the record proper, and can find no reversible error on the face of the record.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Tirado
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2025
State v. Banks
245 S.E.2d 743 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)
State v. Fulcher
243 S.E.2d 338 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 S.E.2d 388, 269 N.C. 697, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carter-nc-1967.