State v. Carter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carter

216 S.W.3d 710, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 433, 2007 WL 738653

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 13, 2007

DocketNo. ED 88187

StatusPublished

This text of 216 S.W.3d 710 (State v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carter, 216 S.W.3d 710, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 433, 2007 WL 738653 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Christopher Carter, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of felony stealing in violation of section 570.030 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[711]*711The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Christopher Carter, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of felony stealing in violation of section 570.030 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[711]*711The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 S.W.3d 710, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 433, 2007 WL 738653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carter-moctapp-2007.