State v. Carter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carter

17 S.W.3d 614, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 716, 2000 WL 622886

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 699 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 16, 2000·No. No. ED 76321·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.202 RSMo 1994 on which she was sentenced as a prior drug offender to six years’ imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.202 RSMo 1994 on which she was sentenced as a prior drug offender to six years’ imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Carter, 17 S.W.3d 614, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 716, 2000 WL 622886 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

17 S.W.3d 614 (State v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.