State v. Carter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carter

894 S.W.2d 212, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 347, 1995 WL 78269

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1705 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 1995·No. Nos. 64564, 66188·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of two counts of offering to commit violence to a corrections officer, § 217.385 RSMo.1994, and from the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

[213]*213We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisdictional purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of two counts of offering to commit violence to a corrections officer, § 217.385 RSMo.1994, and from the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

[213]*213We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisdictional purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Carter, 894 S.W.2d 212, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 347, 1995 WL 78269 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

894 S.W.2d 212 (State v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.