State v. Carter

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Carter

240 So. 3d 907

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 16, 2018·No. No. 2018–KK–0555·Published

Opinion

Further, the 404(B) evidence which the state seeks to introduce is highly prejudicial. Even assuming, arguendo, that the state's evidence meets the strict standards of La.Code Evid. art. 404(B), the evidence is unquestionably more prejudicial than probative, in contravention of La.Code Evid. art. 403, and should not be allowed. Therefore, I would grant this writ, reverse the trial court's ruling, and deny the state's Prieur motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Further, the 404(B) evidence which the state seeks to introduce is highly prejudicial. Even assuming, arguendo, that the state's evidence meets the strict standards of La.Code Evid. art. 404(B), the evidence is unquestionably more prejudicial than probative, in contravention of La.Code Evid. art. 403, and should not be allowed. Therefore, I would grant this writ, reverse the trial court's ruling, and deny the state's Prieur motion.

State v. Carter, 240 So. 3d 907 (La. 2018).

Pincite

240 So. 3d 907 (State v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.