Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Carter

State v. Carter

789 So. 2d 545, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10304, 2001 WL 830564
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 25, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-2860
StatusPublished

This text of 789 So. 2d 545 (State v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Carter, 789 So. 2d 545, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10304, 2001 WL 830564 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

There is no merit to the state’s contention that the trial court improperly sentenced the juvenile appellee defendant to juvenile sanctions notwithstanding his commission of firearm-related crimes. See § 775.087, Fla. Stat. (2000)(requiring minimum sentences). To the contrary, the discretion to do so, an abuse of which is-not even claimed on appeal, is expressly conferred by section 985.227(2)(d)(3), Florida Statutes (2000). See Nelson v. State, 757 So.2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) review denied, 780 So.2d 914 (Fla.2001); M.Z. v. State, 747 So.2d 978 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), review denied, 767 So.2d 458 (Fla.2000).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M.Z. v. State
747 So. 2d 978 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Nelson v. State
757 So. 2d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
789 So. 2d 545, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10304, 2001 WL 830564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carter-fladistctapp-2001.