Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Carter

State v. Carter

601 So. 2d 1341, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8221, 1992 WL 164178
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4042 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 1992·No. No. 91-2421·Published

Opinion

SHIVERS, Judge.

The state’s petition for writ of mandamus is GRANTED. State v. Wager, 599 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); State v. Whitaker, 590 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); see State v. Griffith, 540 So.2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The trial court is directed to adjudicate Carter guilty, in compliance with the mandatory requirement set forth in section 316.656(1), Florida Statutes (1989), of driving under the influence of alcoholic beverages as proscribed by section 316.193(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989). Carter is entitled to be present at that proceeding. We find no error in the withholding of adjudication of guilt as to the other offense, driving with a suspended or revoked license.

MINER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Carter, 601 So. 2d 1341, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8221, 1992 WL 164178 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 1341 (State v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Griffith
540 So. 2d 916 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
State v. Whitaker
590 So. 2d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Wager
599 So. 2d 267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)