State v. Carstaphen
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 175 Ohio St.3d 490.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. CARSTAPHEN, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Carstaphen, 2024-Ohio-976.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2022-1297―Submitted January 6, 2023―Decided March 19, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 110906, 2022-Ohio-3129. _________________ {¶ 1} This cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, and DETERS, JJ., concur. DONNELLY, J., dissents and would hold the cause for the decision in 2023- 1289, State v. Smith. STEWART and BRUNNER, JJ., dissent and would order the parties to brief the appeal on proposition of law No. I. _________________ Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Francis Cavallo, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, Antonio Carstaphen. _________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2024 Ohio 976 (State v. Carstaphen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.