State v. Carson

266 S.W.3d 320, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2008 WL 4210549
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 2008·No. ED 90130·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Orlando Carson appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, of one count of first degree burglary in violation of Section 569.160 RSMo 2000 1 and two counts of violating an order of protection in violation of Sections 455.010 and 455.085. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Carson, 266 S.W.3d 320, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2008 WL 4210549 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

266 S.W.3d 320 (State v. Carson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of C.M.K. v. M.T.
266 S.W.3d 320 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)