State v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Kansas

State v. Carroll

128 P. 399, 88 Kan. 407, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 76

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedDecember 7, 1912

DocketNo. 18,353

StatusPublished

This text of 128 P. 399 (State v. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carroll, 128 P. 399, 88 Kan. 407, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 76 (kan 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellants were adjudged to be guilty of contempt of court in violating an injunction restraining them from keeping and maintaining a nuisance in the Planter’s hotel, in the city of Wichita. The objection that leading questions were asked furnishes no ground for reversal, and the remaining one that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the judgment can not be upheld. ' Under the governing rule, the evidence appears to be ample.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Appellants were adjudged to be guilty of contempt of court in violating an injunction restraining them from keeping and maintaining a nuisance in the Planter’s hotel, in the city of Wichita. The objection that leading questions were asked furnishes no ground for reversal, and the remaining one that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the judgment can not be upheld. ' Under the governing rule, the evidence appears to be ample.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 P. 399, 88 Kan. 407, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carroll-kan-1912.