State v. Carrino

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carrino

489 S.W.3d 328, 2016 WL 2731914, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 464

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 10, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102922

StatusPublished

This text of 489 S.W.3d 328 (State v. Carrino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carrino, 489 S.W.3d 328, 2016 WL 2731914, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 464 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The defendant, Courtney, Carrino, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lincoln County following her conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance (a mixture of heroin and cocaine) in violation of section 195.202 RSMo. (2000). Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The defendant, Courtney, Carrino, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lincoln County following her conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance (a mixture of heroin and cocaine) in violation of section 195.202 RSMo. (2000). Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 S.W.3d 328, 2016 WL 2731914, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carrino-moctapp-2016.