State v. Carrino

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carrino

489 S.W.3d 328, 2016 WL 2731914, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 464

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 2016·No. No. ED 102922·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The defendant, Courtney, Carrino, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lincoln County following her conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance (a mixture of heroin and cocaine) in violation of section 195.202 RSMo. (2000). Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The defendant, Courtney, Carrino, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lincoln County following her conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance (a mixture of heroin and cocaine) in violation of section 195.202 RSMo. (2000). Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Carrino, 489 S.W.3d 328, 2016 WL 2731914, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 464 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

489 S.W.3d 328 (State v. Carrino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.