State v. Carrigan
111 A. 927, 94 N.J.L. 566, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 238
This text of 111 A. 927 (State v. Carrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Carrigan, 111 A. 927, 94 N.J.L. 566, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 238 (N.J. 1920).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.
For reversal—Parker, Kalisch, White, Taylor, JJ. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Searcy
798 P.2d 914 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1990)
State v. Todd
474 P.2d 542 (Washington Supreme Court, 1970)
State v. White
142 A.2d 65 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 A. 927, 94 N.J.L. 566, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carrigan-nj-1920.