State v. Carrick

944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 6, 2011
Docket2011-0230
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 944 N.E.2d 693 (State v. Carrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Carrick, 944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

Wayne App. No. 09CA0077, 2010-Ohio-6451. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed February 8, 2011:

“Whether the ’making unreasonable noise’ provision of [R.C.] 2917.11(A)(2) is unconstitutionally void for vagueness.”
Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Compher (Dec. 9, 1985), Ross App. Nos. 1174 and 1175.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Carrick
2012 Ohio 608 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carrick-ohio-2011.