Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Carrel

State v. Carrel

137 N.E. 915, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 229, 105 Ohio St. 351, 1921 Ohio LEXIS 179
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 29, 1921
DocketNo. 17166
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 137 N.E. 915 (State v. Carrel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Carrel, 137 N.E. 915, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 229, 105 Ohio St. 351, 1921 Ohio LEXIS 179 (Ohio 1921).

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Epitomized Opinion

1. Schultz seeks a writ of mandamus commanding Carrel to certify petitions for referendum to the Board of Deputy State Supervisors and Inspectors of Elections. From a consideration of the findings of the master herein appointed, the Supreme Court held:

1. There was not a sufficient number of valid signatures attached to the various petitions to authorize the referendum sought. Writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toulmin, Jr. v. Becker
115 N.E.2d 705 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1952)
Dillon v. City of Cleveland
158 N.E. 606 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 N.E. 915, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 229, 105 Ohio St. 351, 1921 Ohio LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carrel-ohio-1921.