State v. Carranza

Court of Appeals of Georgia

State v. Carranza

470 S.E.2d 818, 221 Ga. App. 150, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1793, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 401

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 15, 1996

DocketA95A1166

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 470 S.E.2d 818 (State v. Carranza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carranza, 470 S.E.2d 818, 221 Ga. App. 150, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1793, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 401 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Blackburn, Judge.

In State v. Carranza, 217 Ga. App. 431 (457 SE2d 699) (1995), we reversed the trial court’s order which granted Miguel Carranza a/k/a Miguel Carranza Fonnacco’s motion to suppress his statement and motion to suppress evidence. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and affirmed our decision in part and reversed it in part. Carranza v. [151]*151State, 266 Ga. 263 (467 SE2d 315) (1996). The Supreme Court determined that the trial court properly granted the motion to suppress with regard to the evidence but that the motion to suppress was improperly granted with regard to Carranza’s statement. Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.

Decided April 15, 1996. H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Charles M. Stines, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant. Dwight H. May, James M. Bivins, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

McMurray, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackburn, Judge.

In State v. Carranza, 217 Ga. App. 431 (457 SE2d 699) (1995), we reversed the trial court’s order which granted Miguel Carranza a/k/a Miguel Carranza Fonnacco’s motion to suppress his statement and motion to suppress evidence. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and affirmed our decision in part and reversed it in part. Carranza v. [151]*151State, 266 Ga. 263 (467 SE2d 315) (1996). The Supreme Court determined that the trial court properly granted the motion to suppress with regard to the evidence but that the motion to suppress was improperly granted with regard to Carranza’s statement. Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.

Decided April 15, 1996. H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, Charles M. Stines, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant. Dwight H. May, James M. Bivins, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

McMurray, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

470 S.E.2d 818, 221 Ga. App. 150, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1793, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carranza-gactapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack