State v. Carr
This text of State v. Carr (State v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29286
SCWC-29286 16-SEP-2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 01:18 PM
ANGIE DELIGHT CARR,
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI'I,
Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CR. NO. 07-1-0549(1))
ORDER STRIKING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy and McKenna, JJ.)
Having reviewed counsel’s response to the order to show
cause and the record herein, and it appearing that counsel has
not shown good cause as to why his application for writ of
certiorari does not comply with HRAP Rule 40.1(d),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of
certiorari filed on August 25, 2011 is stricken.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file a writ
of certiorari that complies with HRAP Rule 40.1(d) on or by
September 20, 2011 if she wishes to continue pursuing her appeal
before this court.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 16, 2011.
Christopher R. Evans on /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
the application for
petitioner/defendant-appellant /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Carr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carr-haw-2011.