State v. . Carpenter
137 S.E. 869, 193 N.C. 848, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 496
Opinion
The defendant’s exceptions must be overruled. The fact that McGinnis may have been a notorious “blind tiger” could not have availed the defendant. . S. v. Lane, 166 N. C., 333. There was evidence that the defendant’s admission was voluntary, and for this reason the third and fifth exceptions are untenable. The instruction as to the defendant’s possession'of the liquor is sustained by S. v. McAllister, 187 N. C., 400. The other exceptions are without merit and require no discussion.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Carpenter, 137 S.E. 869, 193 N.C. 848, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 496 (N.C. 1927).
137 S.E. 869 (State v. . Carpenter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . McAllister
121 S.E. 739 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)