State v. . Carpenter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Carpenter

137 S.E. 869, 193 N.C. 848, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 496

DecidedMay 4, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 869 (State v. . Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Carpenter, 137 S.E. 869, 193 N.C. 848, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 496 (N.C. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s exceptions must be overruled. The fact that McGinnis may have been a notorious “blind tiger” could not have availed the defendant. . S. v. Lane, 166 N. C., 333. There was evidence that the defendant’s admission was voluntary, and for this reason the third and fifth exceptions are untenable. The instruction as to the defendant’s possession'of the liquor is sustained by S. v. McAllister, 187 N. C., 400. The other exceptions are without merit and require no discussion.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s exceptions must be overruled. The fact that McGinnis may have been a notorious “blind tiger” could not have availed the defendant. . S. v. Lane, 166 N. C., 333. There was evidence that the defendant’s admission was voluntary, and for this reason the third and fifth exceptions are untenable. The instruction as to the defendant’s possession'of the liquor is sustained by S. v. McAllister, 187 N. C., 400. The other exceptions are without merit and require no discussion.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 S.E. 869, 193 N.C. 848, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carpenter-nc-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack