State v. Carpenter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carpenter

560 S.W.3d 920

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 13, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106001

StatusPublished

This text of 560 S.W.3d 920 (State v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carpenter, 560 S.W.3d 920 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Milliard Carpenter appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction after a jury trial for one count of receiving stolen property. There was no error in the court's denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Milliard Carpenter appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction after a jury trial for one count of receiving stolen property. There was no error in the court's denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 S.W.3d 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carpenter-moctapp-2018.