State v. Carpenter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carpenter

815 S.W.2d 958, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1528, 1991 WL 197482

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 8, 1991·No. Nos. 55560, 59717·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, RSMo 1978, and stealing over $150, § 570.030, RSMo 1978, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a full evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, RSMo 1978, and stealing over $150, § 570.030, RSMo 1978, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a full evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Carpenter, 815 S.W.2d 958, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1528, 1991 WL 197482 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

815 S.W.2d 958 (State v. Carpenter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.