State v. Carmouche

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Carmouche

164 So. 3d 168, 2015 La. LEXIS 508, 2015 WL 1401525

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 25, 2015·No. No. 2015-KD-0452·Published

Opinion

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. C, No. 513-985; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2015-K-220.

_JjWrit granted. The trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the prior act. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, a thirteen-day notice of the State’s intent to introduce other crimes evidence is reasonable. Likewise, the probative value of the evidence is not substantially outweighed by a danger of unfair prejudice.

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny. KNOLL, J., would deny. WEIMER, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. C, No. 513-985; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2015-K-220.

_JjWrit granted. The trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the prior act. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, a thirteen-day notice of the State’s intent to introduce other crimes evidence is reasonable. Likewise, the probative value of the evidence is not substantially outweighed by a danger of unfair prejudice.

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny. KNOLL, J., would deny. WEIMER, J., would deny.

State v. Carmouche, 164 So. 3d 168, 2015 La. LEXIS 508, 2015 WL 1401525 (La. 2015).

Pincite

164 So. 3d 168 (State v. Carmouche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.