State v. Carmouche

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Carmouche

527 So. 2d 307, 1988 La. LEXIS 1465

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 29, 1988

DocketNo. 88-KK—1656

StatusPublished

This text of 527 So. 2d 307 (State v. Carmouche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carmouche, 527 So. 2d 307, 1988 La. LEXIS 1465 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Carmouche, Joseph Floyd; applying for supervisory/remedial; Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 84-318-D; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW88-0351.

Prior report: La.App., 526 So.2d 866.

Granted in part; denied in part. The trial set for July 11, 1988 is stayed. The trial judge is ordered to grant defendant’s request to appoint a neurologist and a psychiatrist and any additional experts that these doctors deem necessary. The trial judge is further ordered to appoint experts in fingerprint analysis and serology as requested by defendant. It is further ordered that the inculpatory statements of defendant in Dr. W.A. Hawkins' report be suppressed from use in the penalty phase of his trial. Otherwise, the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Carmouche, Joseph Floyd; applying for supervisory/remedial; Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 84-318-D; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW88-0351.

Prior report: La.App., 526 So.2d 866.

Granted in part; denied in part. The trial set for July 11, 1988 is stayed. The trial judge is ordered to grant defendant’s request to appoint a neurologist and a psychiatrist and any additional experts that these doctors deem necessary. The trial judge is further ordered to appoint experts in fingerprint analysis and serology as requested by defendant. It is further ordered that the inculpatory statements of defendant in Dr. W.A. Hawkins' report be suppressed from use in the penalty phase of his trial. Otherwise, the application is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 So. 2d 307, 1988 La. LEXIS 1465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carmouche-la-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack