State v. Carlton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Carlton. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 Haw. 16
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 24, 2019·No. SCWC-17-0000419·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 24-SEP-2019 01:34 PM SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

BROK CARLTON, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 2PC131000254)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Brok Carlton’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 9, 2019, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 24, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Carlton, (haw 2019).

State v. Carlton (State v. Carlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.