State v. Carlton
619 So. 2d 309, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3168, 1993 WL 64823
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 1993·No. No. 92-0228·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Having accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160, this court reverses the suppression order that was presented in this appeal for review, and remands the case to the trial court. See State v. Rochelle, 609 So.2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
[310]*310ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
We grant the motion and certify as questions of great public importance those certified in State v. Nevadomski, 619 So.2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.
HERSEY, J., dissents without opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Carlton, 619 So. 2d 309, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3168, 1993 WL 64823 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
619 So. 2d 309 (State v. Carlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carlton v. State
636 So. 2d 507 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)