State v. Carlson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Carlson

987 P.2d 523, 160 Or. App. 651, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 771

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 19, 1999

Docket10-97-03843; CA A100608

StatusPublished

This text of 987 P.2d 523 (State v. Carlson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carlson, 987 P.2d 523, 160 Or. App. 651, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 771 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded no contest to six counts of first-degree sexual abuse. On December 4, 1997, the trial court imposed a minimum sentence of 75 months on each count. The court ordered the sentence on Count 1 to commence immediately and ordered the sentences on the remaining counts to be served concurrently, beginning November 2, 2000. Thus, the sentences on the remaining counts were partially concurrent with and partially consecutive to the sentence on Count 1. Defendant appeals, challenging the validity of the sentence, contending that, under ORS 137.123, the trial court has authority to impose either consecutive or concurrent sentences, but not both. In State v. Trice, 159 Or App 1, 5, 976 P2d 569 (1999), however, we held that implicit in the sentencing authority provided in ORS 137.123 is the authority to impose sentences that are partially consecutive and concurrent.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded no contest to six counts of first-degree sexual abuse. On December 4, 1997, the trial court imposed a minimum sentence of 75 months on each count. The court ordered the sentence on Count 1 to commence immediately and ordered the sentences on the remaining counts to be served concurrently, beginning November 2, 2000. Thus, the sentences on the remaining counts were partially concurrent with and partially consecutive to the sentence on Count 1. Defendant appeals, challenging the validity of the sentence, contending that, under ORS 137.123, the trial court has authority to impose either consecutive or concurrent sentences, but not both. In State v. Trice, 159 Or App 1, 5, 976 P2d 569 (1999), however, we held that implicit in the sentencing authority provided in ORS 137.123 is the authority to impose sentences that are partially consecutive and concurrent.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

987 P.2d 523, 160 Or. App. 651, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carlson-orctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack