State v. Carlock

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Carlock

343 So. 2d 1074, 1977 La. LEXIS 5595

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 31, 1977

DocketNo. 59553

StatusPublished

This text of 343 So. 2d 1074 (State v. Carlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carlock, 343 So. 2d 1074, 1977 La. LEXIS 5595 (La. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Willard Carlock, Sr., applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.

Granted.

The petition of the relator, in the above entitled and numbered' case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Warren E. Hood, Jr.. Judge of the Fourteenth Judicial District . Court for the Parish of Calcasieu, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, as quickly as possible, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 18th day of April . 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Willard Carlock, Sr., applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.

Granted.

The petition of the relator, in the above entitled and numbered' case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Warren E. Hood, Jr.. Judge of the Fourteenth Judicial District . Court for the Parish of Calcasieu, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, as quickly as possible, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 18th day of April . 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

343 So. 2d 1074, 1977 La. LEXIS 5595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carlock-la-1977.