State v. Carlisle

466 P.3d 1069, 304 Or. App. 872
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 17, 2020
DocketA169564
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 466 P.3d 1069 (State v. Carlisle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Carlisle, 466 P.3d 1069, 304 Or. App. 872 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Submitted May 28, affirmed June 17, 2020

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ZACHARY DEAN CARLISLE, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 18CR07005; A169564 466 P3d 1069

Eric L. Dahlin, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Stacy M. Du Clos, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Haltom, 298 Or App 533, 447 P3d 66, rev allowed, 365 Or 721 (2019).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Carlisle
515 P.3d 867 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 P.3d 1069, 304 Or. App. 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carlisle-orctapp-2020.