State v. Carhartt

335 So. 2d 554, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4264
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 14, 1976·No. No. 48633·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant received a citation on March 30, 1975, for violating Section 316.028(3), Florida Statutes.* In an order dated October 9, 1975, the trial court granted a motion to dismiss on the ground that this statute was unconstitutionally vague and arbitrary and constituted a denial of due process of law.

On March 17, 1976, this Court filed its opinion in the case of Roberts v. State, 329 So.2d 296. The Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 316.028(3), Florida Statutes, against a challenge identical to the argument advanced by the appellee in the instant case, holding, inter alia, that the statute is a reasonable exercise by the Legislature of the police power of this State.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Carhartt, 335 So. 2d 554, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4264 (Fla. 1976).

335 So. 2d 554 (State v. Carhartt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lujan
141 Cal. App. Supp. 3d 15 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1983)
State v. Hamza
342 So. 2d 80 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
State v. Alachua County
335 So. 2d 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)