State v. Carhartt
This text of 335 So. 2d 554 (State v. Carhartt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant received a citation on March 30, 1975, for violating Section 316.028(3), Florida Statutes.
On March 17, 1976, this Court filed its opinion in the case of Roberts v. State, 329 So.2d 296. The Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 316.028(3), Florida Statutes, against a challenge identical to the argument advanced by the appellee in the instant case, holding, inter alia, that the statute is a reasonable exercise by the Legislature of the police power of this State.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
“It is unlawful and punishable as provided in subsection (4) for any person with a blood alcohol level of 0.10 percent, or above, to drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this state.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
335 So. 2d 554, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carhartt-fla-1976.