State v. Carey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Carey

156 So. 2d 799, 245 La. 79, 1963 La. LEXIS 2609

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 29, 1963

DocketNo. 46985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 So. 2d 799 (State v. Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carey, 156 So. 2d 799, 245 La. 79, 1963 La. LEXIS 2609 (La. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs granted. The ruling of the trial judge is annulled and set aside at this time. Due to the exigencies of the case, the jury having been empaneled and sworn, and the first witness called and sworn, the trial judge is ordered to overrule the objection as to the sufficiency of the opening statement and proceed with the trial, reserving to the defendant the right to urge this particular issue in the event of a conviction, by properly reserved bills of exception.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs granted. The ruling of the trial judge is annulled and set aside at this time. Due to the exigencies of the case, the jury having been empaneled and sworn, and the first witness called and sworn, the trial judge is ordered to overrule the objection as to the sufficiency of the opening statement and proceed with the trial, reserving to the defendant the right to urge this particular issue in the event of a conviction, by properly reserved bills of exception.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 So. 2d 799, 245 La. 79, 1963 La. LEXIS 2609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carey-la-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack