State v. Carey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Carey

597 A.2d 336, 220 Conn. 912, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 442

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 19, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 597 A.2d 336 (State v. Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carey, 597 A.2d 336, 220 Conn. 912, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 442 (Colo. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 421, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the failure of the state to comply with Practice Book § 943 with respect to initiating this proceeding for revocation of the defendant’s probation deprive the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction?

“2. Did the defendant waive such noncompliance by failing to raise this procedural defect in the trial court?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 421, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the failure of the state to comply with Practice Book § 943 with respect to initiating this proceeding for revocation of the defendant’s probation deprive the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction?

“2. Did the defendant waive such noncompliance by failing to raise this procedural defect in the trial court?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

597 A.2d 336, 220 Conn. 912, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carey-conn-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack