State v. Cardwell

538 P.2d 372, 22 Or. App. 240, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 1187

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in not instructing the jury to the effect that intoxication could he considered in determining whether defendant had a mental disease or defect at the time he is alleged to have shot the victim. We do not reach this question because defendant did not request the trial judge to give an instruction on this point nor did he except to any of the instructions that were given on the subject.

Affirmed.