State v. Cardinali

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Cardinali

496 P.2d 246, 9 Or. App. 430

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 4, 1972

DocketNo. 71-1427-C

StatusPublished

This text of 496 P.2d 246 (State v. Cardinali) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cardinali, 496 P.2d 246, 9 Or. App. 430 (Or. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUBIAM.

Defendant was convicted by jury of selling a dangerous drug, OBS 475.100, and received a 10-year sentence. He urges as his ground of appeal that his motions for acquittal should have been allowed because there was insufficient evidence that the dangerous drug, secobarbitol, was sold by defendant. We have examined the record and while the evidence is circumstantial, it is ample to support the verdict.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUBIAM.

Defendant was convicted by jury of selling a dangerous drug, OBS 475.100, and received a 10-year sentence. He urges as his ground of appeal that his motions for acquittal should have been allowed because there was insufficient evidence that the dangerous drug, secobarbitol, was sold by defendant. We have examined the record and while the evidence is circumstantial, it is ample to support the verdict.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

496 P.2d 246, 9 Or. App. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cardinali-orctapp-1972.