State v. Caples

696 S.E.2d 527, 361 N.C. 165
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 21, 2006·No. 512P05·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Attorney General’s Petition for Discretionary Review for defendant Capíes is allowed, pursuant to our general supervisory authority under Article IV, Section 12 of the Constitution of North Carolina, for the limited purpose of (1) vacating that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion ordering remand to the trial court for resentencing and (2) remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Timothy Earl Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, - S.E.2d-(2006). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects.

The Attorney General’s Petition for Discretionary Review for defendant Mitchell is allowed for the limited purpose of (1) vacating that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion ordering remand to the trial court for resentencing and (2) remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Timothy Earl Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, -S.E.2d-(2006). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 21st day of December, 2006.

s/Timmons-Goodson. J. For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Caples, 696 S.E.2d 527, 361 N.C. 165 (N.C. 2006).

696 S.E.2d 527 (State v. Caples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Blackwell
638 S.E.2d 452 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)