State v. Capawanna
This text of 196 A. 679 (State v. Capawanna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in its opinion. We reserve, however, and do not pass upon, the question of whether the admission in evidence of a certain X-ray photograph was error.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 A. 679, 119 N.J.L. 337, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-capawanna-nj-1938.