State v. Canty

858 So. 2d 367, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16706
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 5, 2003
DocketNos. 3D02-1231, 3D02-1230
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 858 So. 2d 367 (State v. Canty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Canty, 858 So. 2d 367, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16706 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals a downward departure sentence. We reverse.

Assuming for present purposes that the downward departure reasons given by the trial court were valid for Miami-Dade County Circuit Court case number 01-34599, those reasons have no apparent relationship to the other crime with which defendant-appellant Canty was charged, grand theft of a vehicle, in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court case number 02-6461. We therefore return the case to the trial court for resentencing, or alternatively, with leave for the defendant to withdraw his plea. See State v. Roberts, 824 So.2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); State v. Johnson, 796 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); State v. Ford, 739 So.2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Young
901 So. 2d 301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Brandful v. State
858 So. 2d 367 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
858 So. 2d 367, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-canty-fladistctapp-2003.