Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Cantwell

State v. Cantwell

844 N.E.2d 1190, 108 Ohio St. 3d 528
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 19, 2006
DocketNos. 2004-1188 and 2004-1688
StatusPublished

This text of 844 N.E.2d 1190 (State v. Cantwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cantwell, 844 N.E.2d 1190, 108 Ohio St. 3d 528 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Threatt, 108 Ohio St.3d 277, 2006-Ohio-905, 843 N.E.2d 164, and the judgments of the trial court denying appellee’s motions to waive court costs and to vacate the order of garnishment are reinstated.

John D. Ferrero, Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kathleen 0. Tatar-sky and Amy S. Andrews, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant. J. Dean Carro, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989, 817 N.E.2d 393.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. White
103 Ohio St. 3d 580 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)
State v. Threatt
843 N.E.2d 164 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
844 N.E.2d 1190, 108 Ohio St. 3d 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cantwell-ohio-2006.