State v. Canosa

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJune 17, 2014
DocketSCWC-11-0001051
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Canosa (State v. Canosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Canosa, (haw 2014).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0001051 17-JUN-2014 01:44 PM

SCWC-11-0001051

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE OF HAWAI'I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

STANLEY CANOSA,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-11-0001051; CR. NO. 09-1-1524)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stanley Canosa’s

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on May 6, 2014, is

hereby rejected.1

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 17, 2014.

Emmanuel V. Tipon /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

for petitioner

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Sonja P. McCullen

for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Upon retrial, the trial court may consider the appropriateness of an “inference” instruction. See State v. Steger, 114 Hawai'i 162, 171 n.18, 158 P.3d 280, 289 n.18 (2006); State v. Matafeo, 71 Haw. 183, 189, 787 P.2d 671, 674 (1990) (Wakatsuki, J., concurring); Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 59-60 (1988) (Stevens, J., concurring).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arizona v. Youngblood
488 U.S. 51 (Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Matafeo
787 P.2d 671 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1990)
State v. Steger
158 P.3d 280 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Canosa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-canosa-haw-2014.