State v. Cano

529 So. 2d 762, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143, 1988 WL 73586
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 1988·No. No. 88-294·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s sentence outside of the guidelines is reversed because it is not accompanied by the required written statement delineating the reasons for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); Vidal v. State, 516 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cano, 529 So. 2d 762, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143, 1988 WL 73586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

529 So. 2d 762 (State v. Cano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jackson
478 So. 2d 1054 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Vidal v. State
516 So. 2d 1051 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)