State v. Cano
529 So. 2d 762, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143, 1988 WL 73586
This text of 529 So. 2d 762 (State v. Cano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Cano, 529 So. 2d 762, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143, 1988 WL 73586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
The trial court’s sentence outside of the guidelines is reversed because it is not accompanied by the required written statement delineating the reasons for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); Vidal v. State, 516 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Jackson
478 So. 2d 1054 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Vidal v. State
516 So. 2d 1051 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
529 So. 2d 762, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3143, 1988 WL 73586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cano-fladistctapp-1988.