State v. Cannon

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Cannon

722 N.E.2d 90, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1484, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 35

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 7, 2000

Docket99-2319

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 722 N.E.2d 90 (State v. Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cannon, 722 N.E.2d 90, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1484, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 35 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-970765. On December 30, 1999, appellant filed a notice of appeal, motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment, and notice of pending motion to certify a conflict. In lieu of the filing fee required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1), appellant tendered a document titled “Affidavit of Indigency.” Whereas appellant’s document is not notarized, it does not meet the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-970765. On December 30, 1999, appellant filed a notice of appeal, motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment, and notice of pending motion to certify a conflict. In lieu of the filing fee required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1), appellant tendered a document titled “Affidavit of Indigency.” Whereas appellant’s document is not notarized, it does not meet the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(3). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

722 N.E.2d 90, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1484, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cannon-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack