State v. . Cannon

42 S.E.2d 343, 227 N.C. 336, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 422
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 16, 1947·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

It is conceded that the defendant’s right of appeal, G. S., 15-180, and his right to have the case made up, or a postea properly prepared, G. S., 1-282, 1-283, are not to be abridged, except through his own fault or laches. S. v. Moore, 210 N. C., 686, 188 S. E., 421. Here, however, the Attorney-General is asking that the exceptions and objections filed by the solicitor (and later abandoned by him) be withdrawn and thus leave the defendant’s statement as the case on appeal. This accords with the decisions on the subject. Drake v. Connelly, 107 N. C., 463, 12 S. E., 251; Parker v. Coggins, 116 N. C., 71, 20 S. E., 962; Ridley v. R. R., 116 N. C., 923, 20 S. E., 962. Cf. Metcalfe v. Chambers, 188 N. C., 805, 125 S. E., 630. “We do not see how the appellant can object to the statement made out by himself.” Drake v. Connelly, supra.

Motion of defendant, Denied.

Motion of Attorney-General, Allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Cannon, 42 S.E.2d 343, 227 N.C. 336, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 422 (N.C. 1947).

42 S.E.2d 343 (State v. . Cannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lucas
92 S.E.2d 401 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
State v. Sailor
81 S.E.2d 191 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Respass v. Bonner
74 S.E.2d 721 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)