State v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Cannon

369 So. 2d 711, 1979 La. LEXIS 8153

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 12, 1979

DocketNo. 64363

StatusPublished

This text of 369 So. 2d 711 (State v. Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cannon, 369 So. 2d 711, 1979 La. LEXIS 8153 (La. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In re H. M. “Mike” Cannon applying for writs of review, mandamus and certiorari and for a stay order. Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 2-79-156.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Frank Shea Ad Hoc Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of E. Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 26th day of April, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be assigned by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re H. M. “Mike” Cannon applying for writs of review, mandamus and certiorari and for a stay order. Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 2-79-156.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Frank Shea Ad Hoc Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of E. Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 26th day of April, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be assigned by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 So. 2d 711, 1979 La. LEXIS 8153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cannon-la-1979.