State v. . Cannaday

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Cannaday

35 S.E.2d 333, 225 N.C. 770

DecidedOctober 10, 1945

StatusPublished

This text of 35 S.E.2d 333 (State v. . Cannaday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Cannaday, 35 S.E.2d 333, 225 N.C. 770 (N.C. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe only assignment of error brought forward in tbe case on appeal is tbe denial by tbe court below of defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit. An examination of tbe record leads us to tbe conclusion tbat tbe evidence offered by tbe State was sufficient to carry tbe case to tbe jury, and that tbe defendant’s motion was properly denied. Tbe evidence supports the verdict and judgment. In tbe trial we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Tbe only assignment of error brought forward in tbe case on appeal is tbe denial by tbe court below of defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit. An examination of tbe record leads us to tbe conclusion tbat tbe evidence offered by tbe State was sufficient to carry tbe case to tbe jury, and that tbe defendant’s motion was properly denied. Tbe evidence supports the verdict and judgment. In tbe trial we find

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 S.E.2d 333, 225 N.C. 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cannaday-nc-1945.