State v. Cannada
455 S.E.2d 158, 340 N.C. 101, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 159
Opinion
The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in Judge Greene’s dissenting opinion pertaining to the suffi[102] ciency of the evidence. Therefore, the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of any other issues properly raised in defendant’s appeal to that court.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cannada, 455 S.E.2d 158, 340 N.C. 101, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 159 (N.C. 1995).
455 S.E.2d 158 (State v. Cannada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Wilkerson
675 S.E.2d 678 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
State v. Cannada
458 S.E.2d 268 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)