State v. Cann

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Cann

313 So. 2d 603, 1975 La. LEXIS 3614

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 13, 1975

DocketNo. 56266

StatusPublished

This text of 313 So. 2d 603 (State v. Cann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cann, 313 So. 2d 603, 1975 La. LEXIS 3614 (La. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Freddie Lee Cann, applying for writs of certiorari and review.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Fred Fudickar, Jr., Judge of the Fourth Judicial District Court, for the Parish of Ouachita, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 25th day of June, 1975, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 29th day of August, 1975, at 10:00 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Freddie Lee Cann, applying for writs of certiorari and review.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Fred Fudickar, Jr., Judge of the Fourth Judicial District Court, for the Parish of Ouachita, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 25th day of June, 1975, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 29th day of August, 1975, at 10:00 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

313 So. 2d 603, 1975 La. LEXIS 3614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cann-la-1975.