State v. Canady
99 S.E.2d 776, 246 N.C. 613, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 491
Opinion
While the record on defendant’s purported appeal fails to disclose prejudicial error, any discussion of defendant’s assignments of error would be irrelevant; for, under the facts stated, the appeal must be and is dismissed on authority of S. v. Lakey, 191 N.C. 571, 132 S.E. 570.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Canady, 99 S.E.2d 776, 246 N.C. 613, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 491 (N.C. 1957).
99 S.E.2d 776 (State v. Canady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Cooke
150 S.E.2d 226 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
State v. Hairston
100 S.E.2d 847 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)